T Tekin Works All free tools

Tekin Works › Free tools › Deduction cost

What a retail deduction actually costs
— and when fighting it loses money

A deduction is not a discount. It comes out of gross profit, not out of revenue, which is why the face value understates it every time. This prices that, and then finds the deduction size below which building the dispute costs more than it recovers.

One deduction
Your margin on what you ship to this chain.
What disputing one costs you
Pulling the order, the POD, the price file and the deal sheet.
Share of disputed value you actually get back.
The year
Be honest here. Some deductions are simply correct.
Gross profit removed by this deductionThe full face value — it lands entirely on margin—
Revenue you must ship to replace itAt the same gross margin—
Cost to build one disputeHours at loaded cost—
Expected recovery on this oneDeduction at your recovery rate, less the cost of filing—
Break-even deduction sizeBelow this, disputing loses money on average—
Unsubstantiated deductions per yearYour count and average, at the share you entered—
Revenue equivalent of thatWhat you would have to ship to earn it back instead—
Recoverable, net of the workAt your recovery rate, less the cost of filing every one—

Why the write-off threshold is the whole problem

Not the deductions you fight. The ones you decided long ago were too small to bother with.

Every brand selling into chains has a number in its head below which a deduction just gets written off. It is rarely written down and almost never calculated. It is set by how long it takes someone to pull the order, find the proof of delivery, check the price that was in force on the order date and dig out the deal sheet — and by how tired that person is of doing it.

That threshold is doing more damage than any individual deduction, because deduction volume lives in the tail. The handful of large ones get fought. The hundreds of small ones fund themselves. And the arithmetic above shows why they should not: at a 24% margin, a year of small unsubstantiated deductions is a revenue number several times its own size.

There is only one lever. The recovery rate is largely set by whether your paperwork supports you, and you cannot argue your way past a genuine late shipment. What you can change is the ninety minutes. Every minute taken out of assembling a dispute lowers the break-even, and the break-even is what decides how far down the tail you get to go.

The other half of this, which no calculator can do for you: concede the part of the claim that was fair. A dispute that contests a valid late-delivery penalty alongside an invalid price claim tends to get refused whole, on principle, and it costs you the next one as well.

What this does not do

It is an estimate built from four numbers you typed. Here is where it stops.

  • It does not know your recovery rate. Recovery varies enormously by retailer, by deduction type and by how good your documentation is. The figure you enter drives everything downstream of it.
  • It does not validate a single deduction. It cannot see your orders, your proofs of delivery, your price files or your authorised deals, so it has no opinion on whether any particular claim is fair.
  • It assumes one average. Real deduction books are heavily skewed, and a mean hides that. Treat the annual figures as an order of magnitude.
  • It does not model the relationship. Disputing everything indiscriminately has a cost that does not appear on this page.
  • It is not accounting or legal advice.

Common questions

Why does a deduction cost more than its face value?

Because it comes out of gross profit, not revenue. A $10,000 deduction on a line carrying 24% gross margin has removed $10,000 of profit, and replacing that profit takes roughly $41,700 of additional shipping at the same margin. That is the number worth putting in front of whoever decides these are too small to chase.

What is the break-even deduction size?

The point where the cost of building and filing the dispute equals the money you expect to get back. Below it, disputing loses money on average. Above it, not disputing does. Most brands have a write-off threshold set by instinct rather than by this arithmetic, and it is usually set too high — which is exactly where the volume of small deductions sits.

Should I dispute every deduction?

No, and a tool that told you to would be lying. Some deductions are perfectly valid: you shipped late, you shipped short, you agreed the promotion. Disputing those damages the relationship and gets the whole claim refused on principle. The work is separating the part of the claim that was fair from the part that was not, and conceding the first.

What actually reduces the break-even size?

Only one thing: the cost of assembling a dispute. The recovery rate is largely set by whether your paperwork supports you. If pulling the order, the proof of delivery, the price in force on the order date and the authorised deal takes ninety minutes of someone's time, the break-even is high and everything under it is written off. Get that to a few minutes and the threshold collapses.

Is this an estimate?

Yes, and it is only as good as the four numbers you type in. Recovery rates in particular vary enormously by retailer, deduction type and how good your documentation is. Use it to compare scenarios and to size a decision, not to forecast a specific number.

If the ninety minutes is the problem

That is the whole of what Recoup does. Every deduction is tested against paperwork you already have — the order against what actually shipped, the price in force on the order date, the authorised deal with its rate and its cap, and the rest of the account for duplicates — and then it writes the dispute.

It concedes the part of the claim that was fair, so the whole dispute does not get refused on principle. It is live and loaded with a real-shaped deduction book; there is a written five-minute walkthrough and the demo login is on the page.